Baron Blowhard aka Kayaboy

My crazy ramblings about how much things suck with a hint of moronity and a slender dab of absurdment. Simple enough, isn't it?
Scoundrel
Rolling Stone's recent cover story, The Worst President in History, almost redeems Rolling Stone magazine. Sadly, it is too little too late to regain it's stature in the credible music world. This passage gives a good idea about the tone of the article:
The monster deficits, caused by increased federal spending combined with the reduction of revenue resulting from the tax cuts, have also placed Bush's administration in a historic class of its own with respect to government borrowing. According to the Treasury Department, the forty-two presidents who held office between 1789 and 2000 borrowed a combined total of $1.01 trillion from foreign governments and financial institutions. But between 2001 and 2005 alone, the Bush White House borrowed $1.05 trillion, more than all of the previous presidencies combined. Having inherited the largest federal surplus in American history in 2001, he has turned it into the largest deficit ever -- with an even higher deficit, $423 billion, forecast for fiscal year 2006. Yet Bush -- sounding much like Herbert Hoover in 1930 predicting that "prosperity is just around the corner" -- insists that he will cut federal deficits in half by 2009, and that the best way to guarantee this would be to make permanent his tax cuts, which helped cause the deficit in the first place!
Does anyone else think it is absurd when people complain about the leaking of classified information about secret (and oh yeah maybe not legal) White House approved operations? I mean their righteous indignation at the leakers and not the programs themselves baffles me.
"With deep ties to the oil and gas industry, Bush and Cheney have unleashed a national energy plan that has begun to destroy hunting and fishing on millions of federal acres throughout the West, setting back effective wildlife management for decades to come....Our energy security can never result from more drilling in our public wildernesses. Of course, the worldwide quest for fuel damages the environment wherever it is unleashed. As Doug Grann, the president and CEO of Wildlife Forever, the conservation arm of the North American Hunting and Fishing
Club, points out, we cannot sacrifice the wildlife and wild country of this planet while doing nothing to develop alternative fuels and improving the fuel efficiency of our cars, factories, and homes."
The boldness of Norton's claim was particularly galling given the Bush Administration's record on wetlans. President Bush, like other presidents before him, promised a policy of "no net loss" of wetlands, but his administration has consistently supported rollbacks of the Clean Water Act to satisfy industry and development. While saying the nation's wetlands picture remains "precarious," Norton added that "even ponds that are not a high quality of wetlands are better than not having wetlands." Now there's a ringing endorsement of the president's program. Norton's announcement was likely an act of setting the table for more administration assaults on wetlands protections. It was probably no coincidence that three days earlier, the Army Corps of Engineers and Environmental Protection Agency proposed new regulations that encourage development of companies that build artificial wetlands used by industries that destroy the vital natural habitats. It's part of the wetlands mitigation banking concept, which gives companies permits to drain wetlands, as long as they produce "new" wetlands somewhere else. Norton may thinnk a water hazard is better than no wetlands but for fish, wildlife, and sportsmen it may be worse. That type of pulic policy provides an excuse for more permits to drain more natural and productive wetlands to be replaced by non-productive water hazards. Those might be good for real estate values along the 18th fairway, but for fish and wildlife that rely on wetlands ecosystems to survive, it's terrible."
A horribly ugly feline at that. Does anyone else thing that Dr. Shabubu may not get the best results from this flyer? Unless of course there really isn't any cat missing, and there is just some weird hypnotic message at the number that gets people to join some disturbed Christian cult?
Recent months have been harsh towards my inclinations to post anything other than random trite. This may in fact just be the fate of me mangled and overly stimulated noggin. Or maybe a more general malaise affecting the subconscience of me mind. I suppose I'm just hoe up for inspiration.